Recent Commission decisions regarding the Clifton Springs Golf Club (PDF, 396.7 KB) and Monbulk Bowling Club (PDF, 375.92 KB) are examples of the Commission holding venues to account for failing to deliver on promises in a timely fashion.
Both venues proposed building works as part of their applications for additional EGMs, however, they were not completed on time.
The Commission approved their applications for an extension of time but it required the venues to turn off the additional EGMs until the works were completed.
VGCCC Chairperson Fran Thorn said the Commission applies strict gambling harm minimisation criteria when assessing applications for extra poker machines.
“Our decisions signal clear expectations for venue operators. If they are granted approval to operate additional EGMs based on promised building improvements, we’ll hold them to their promises.
“When a venue wants more gaming machines, we carefully look at economic and social factors, and at the Responsible Service of Gambling measures they have in place that are over and above the minimum requirements, to help keep their patrons safe,” said Ms Thorn.
“Protecting the community from gambling related harm is at the centre of our decision to grant or not grant these applications for additional EGMs. Make no mistake, if we are not satisfied, we have and will decline these applications.”
Gaming venues that apply for more poker machines based on promised building and amenity improvements and extensions must substantially complete their works in a timely fashion, otherwise they’ll be directed to turn their machines off or not operate the additional machines.